Skip to main content

Social Experiment - Baby Left in Car


8:18

Observing the behaviour of people who pass by a vehicle with a baby locked in the car. (Staged)

This would connect with both the Physical Aspect of Being and the Emotional. We know that, in several ways, the body and mind works to maintain the status quo or balance(homeoestasis) so it is interesting to see people who seeminly are uninvolved or unaffected by this situation get involved and become a part of the situation. What Motivates them? Their intrinsic cognitive motivation where they do it for their own purposes (intrinsic) and mentally recognize a threat (to someone else in this case) but they cognitively try to eliminate the threat or risk to the infant. Maybe, by recognizing a threat to another human being, especially one who cannot protect themselves, they themselves feel threatened and feel compelled, by instinct? to act? Who knows...

We've also learned that emotions are different from feelings. While emotions are more intense and momentary, feelings are longer-lasting and more general. The reactions these "advocates" have are straight emotional ones - intense states. Does it seem like the man was able to calm down more quickly than the woman, after they were debriefed? We learned that the male parasympathetic nervous system responds more quickly than a womans - that fight / flight system kicks in but can calm a man down more quickly.

So much to consider... now that we've been studying this course!!

Question: How do you think the actress playing the reckless mother felt during each scenario when she was confronted by such passionately angry people?? Would her fight/flight reflex kick in... and would you expect her experience to be as emotional as the people who confronted her?

ALSO! Consider as well the difference between people who act on their own and the people who were acting as a group! We've discussed the fact that people respond differently when they are on their own - they assume it's not their problem and that someone else will deal with it - but in a group you gain motivation because you have that reassurance that others support your belief. It's pretty cool to see three ordinary strangers work together to protect a child they feel is in danger!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GOVT300, 2010 Spring, Blog List

1. Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 by Chadwick Atkinson http://mygalantvr-4.blogspot.com/2010/01/mitsubishi-galant-vr-4.html 2. Thoughts For Today … Religion, Politics, and Austrian Economics by Aaron Baker http://abaker88.wordpress.com/ 3. Postconceived Notions by Amelia http://postnotions.blogspot.com/ 4. Lily's Dog Blog by Lily lbolourian.blogspot.com 5. Washington Capitals by Michael Cherry http://unleashthefury8.blogspot.com/ 6. Things That I Find Interesting by Miss Y http://ylcstuff.blogspot.com 7. Washington Capitals by Chris http://chriscapsnews.blogspot.com/ 8. 1-Off ASPEC by Ryan http://masonstyledebate.blogspot.com/ 9. Waldoslife http://waldoslife.blogspot.com/ 10. Tony Bala by Antonio Garcia http://agarciag-tonybala.blogspot.com 11. Tabula Rasa http://lostblogforschool.blogspot.com/ 12. War Stories http://warstories-brah1.blogspot.com/ 13. The Metacognition of Tim Holman by Tim Holman http://themetacognitionoftimholman.blogspot.com/ 14. Filthy Gorgeous http://eliselo...

Social Experiment - Responsibility of Strangers

This experiment explores common situations to test to see what variables are more likely to elicit a protective response from strangers. A normal-looking woman leaves her belongings unattended at the beach and a man (part of the experiment) comes by and steals her Ipod and speakers. No one really helps, though they notice, but if the normal-looking woman makes small talk with people nearby, they are much more likely to respond to the thief. Switch the normal-looking woman for someone much more attractive and things change. She doesn't have to even make small talk - people step in to react when the thief steals her things but the difference is they all noticed her more... because we notice beautiful people, we're more aware of them when they're near us. Take that same beautiful woman, though, and tell her to come on to another woman's husband a bit... she's suddenly not someone to just observe, she becomes a threat and is treated quite differently. We've been tal...

U.S. apologizes for newly revealed syphilis experiments done in Guatemala

By Rob Stein Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, October 1, 2010; 1:57 PM http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/01/AR2010100104457.html?hpid=topnews The United States issued an unusual apology Friday to Guatemala for conducting experiments in the 1940s in which doctors infected soldiers, prisoners and mental patients with syphilis and other sexually transmitted diseases. The experiments, conducted by a physician who was later involved in the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study in Alabama, involved a total of 696 men and women who were drafted into studies aimed at determining the effectiveness of penicillin. "The sexually transmitted disease inoculation study conducted from 1946-1948 in Guatemala was clearly unethical," Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a joint statement. "Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research co...