Skip to main content

Stanford Prison Experiment

Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Experiment (2 min)


Stanford Prison Experiment (5.5 min)


BBC - The Stanford Prison Experiment - 1/3


BBC - The Stanford Prison Experiment - 2/3


The Stanford prison experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a team of researchers led by Psychology Professor Dr. Philip Zimbardo, Ph.D., at Stanford University. Twenty-four undergraduates were selected out of over 75 to play the roles of both guards and prisoners and live in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology building. Roles were assigned at random. The participants adapted to their roles well beyond what even Zimbardo himself expected, leading the guards to display authoritarian measures. The experiment even affected Zimbardo himself. Five of the prisoners were upset enough by the process to quit the experiment early, and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days. The experimental process and the results remain controversial. The entire experiment was filmed, with excerpts soon made publicly available, leaving some disturbed by the resulting film. Over 30 years later, Zimbardo found renewed interest in the experiment when the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse scandal occurred.

he experiment was widely criticized as being unethical and unscientific. Subsequently-adopted ethical standards of psychology would make it a breach of ethics to conduct such a study in more modern times. The study would violate the Ethics Code of the American Psychological Association, the Canadian Code of Conduct for Research Involving Humans, and the Belmont Report. Critics including Erich Fromm challenged how readily the results of the experiment could be generalized. Fromm specifically wrote about how the personality of an individual does in fact affect behavior when imprisoned, using historical examples from the Nazi concentration camps. This ran counter to the study's conclusion that the prison situation itself controls the individual's behavior. Fromm also argued that the amount of sadism in the "normal" subjects could not be determined with the methods employed to screen them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GOVT300, 2010 Spring, Blog List

1. Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 by Chadwick Atkinson http://mygalantvr-4.blogspot.com/2010/01/mitsubishi-galant-vr-4.html 2. Thoughts For Today … Religion, Politics, and Austrian Economics by Aaron Baker http://abaker88.wordpress.com/ 3. Postconceived Notions by Amelia http://postnotions.blogspot.com/ 4. Lily's Dog Blog by Lily lbolourian.blogspot.com 5. Washington Capitals by Michael Cherry http://unleashthefury8.blogspot.com/ 6. Things That I Find Interesting by Miss Y http://ylcstuff.blogspot.com 7. Washington Capitals by Chris http://chriscapsnews.blogspot.com/ 8. 1-Off ASPEC by Ryan http://masonstyledebate.blogspot.com/ 9. Waldoslife http://waldoslife.blogspot.com/ 10. Tony Bala by Antonio Garcia http://agarciag-tonybala.blogspot.com 11. Tabula Rasa http://lostblogforschool.blogspot.com/ 12. War Stories http://warstories-brah1.blogspot.com/ 13. The Metacognition of Tim Holman by Tim Holman http://themetacognitionoftimholman.blogspot.com/ 14. Filthy Gorgeous http://eliselo...

Social Experiment - Shopping While Black

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAkDHuimJRc This experiment turns into a pretty emotional one. While some people are unaffected by the discrimination they observe, others are completely offended on behalf of the victim. One man who objects to her treatment can relate because of his own experiences, but other people (two different white women) seem completely offended by the idea that anyone would be treated in such a way. Consider (though we haven't talked about this year) what is it about some people that makes them step forward on behalf of a stranger? Some people are content to witness something in their surroundings but are somewhat unaffected by it, while others are compelled to act. What is the motivating factor? Could it have anything to do with each person's place in Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, maybe? The stronger ones who are higher in the chart, closer to self-actualization, may feel more comfortable stepping forward while others, less secure in themselves and the...